Sixty-vote rule has outlived usefulness

By: 
Hal Harper and Bob Brown
Thursday, January 3, 2019

One of us is a Democrat; the other is a Republican.  We each served more than a quarter of a century in the Montana Legislature, mostly at the same time. We also held positions of top leadership in both the Senate and House of Representatives.  We have been serious rivals, but always friends; now we are serious old friends.  For the first time, we are standing together to pass on a perspective few others can share.

Over 30 years ago the legislature was at times overwhelmed with bills introduced for almost every imaginable purpose. A specially composed bipartisan commission was formed to recommend a solution to the deepening problem of late-night House sessions chaotically passing, reconsidering, killing, and again reconsidering myriad pieces of legislation.  The key adopted recommendation was to allow only 40 members of the 100 member House of Representatives to keep bills bottled up in committees.

This helped reduce floor time, but it also greatly increased the power of the House Speaker who assigns bills to the committees and also appoints the committee members.  A bill once assigned to a committee could simply be “tabled” in the committee and held there indefinitely, effectively killing it. Only a “super majority” of 60 votes could “blast” it out of committee and onto the floor so it could be debated by all the elected representatives.

This rule, created faster floor efficiency, but has been used by some House leaders to more easily keep bills they don’t like simply buried alive in committees.

We both have come to agree that the 60-vote rule has clearly outlived its usefulness, and has now become a worse impairment to the legislative process than the problem it was designed to eliminate. While our state constitution requires super-majorities in certain special cases, power politics is not one of them.

It is time to gently deliver Montana’s 30-year experiment with minority control to our history’s legislative trash bin. The rules of the Montana Senate provide for the protection of the rights of the minority, but not rule by the minority.  House rules should do the same.  The constitutional responsibility of the Montana House of Representatives is to represent the Montana people.  It can’t do that by arbitrarily granting super power to the representatives of only a minority of the people, which is a clear violation of one of the fundamental precepts of representative democracy.  The Montana House should return to the rules the Senate has always followed, get back to its traditional roots, and rid itself of its “60 vote rule.”

 

Hal Harper, Helena, is a past Speaker of the Montana House

Bob Brown, Whitefish, is a past President of the Montana Senate 

Upcoming Events

Friday, January 18, 2019
First & third Thursdays, 6 p.m., at The Crossings, 600 Roundhouse Dr.
Saturday, January 19, 2019
Third Saturdays, 1 p.m., The Crossings, 600 Roundhouse Dr.
Monday, January 21, 2019
Corinthian Lodge No. 72, AF&AM, first & third Monday, 7:30 p.m., Masonic Temple, Laurel Masonic Temple, 9900 Airport Road (except July-August)
Tuesday, January 22, 2019
Tuesdays, Noon, Beartooth Grill, 305 1st Ave. S.
Tuesday, January 22, 2019
Fourth Tuesdays, 7 p.m., Eagles Hall, 313 W. Main, 628-4503
Wednesday, January 23, 2019
10 a.m., Laurel Public Library, 720 West Third Street, Laurel, 628-4961

Poll

Do you think Medicaid expansion should be a priority for the 2019 Montana legislative session?

The Laurel Outlook

 

Click Here to Check Out Our Latest Ads

We use Google cookies to determine our demographic of visitors to our site. You can opt out here.

We also use Twitter Analytics to track clicks from our twitter feed. 

You can find all the City Council documents that we have received here.